Let me at the outset clarify that i am not a great fan of Rajnikant.In fact i am an ordent admirer of KamalHasan and possibly this blog will not have sufficient space to record my appreciation of kamal's great avatars.
But that should not stand in the way of my sincere appreciation of the movie 'enthiran" and hence this post. Again i would like to make a disclaimer to the effect that whatever has been conveyed thru this post is not another advertising gimmick on behalf of "Sun pictures" who in my opinion had slightly over done their part in so far as advertisement and publicity goes, with the result some of the natural chrams of the movie, which would have been otherwise relished by a movie goer when he sees it first time,had already been A CASUALTY.
NOW COMING TO THE FINER POINTS OF THE MOVIE , let me say it as short and sweet as possible>
> The three roles played by Rajni, as "Scientist,as Robo with Constructive features and as Robo with Destructive features" are brilliantly portrayed with very deft and subtle chAnges in hair style, walking style, intonation and delivery of dialogues and semblances of Rajni of 16 vayathinele & 3 mudicchu come back with a vengence after decades.Cudos to dance masters WHO HAD PERCEIVED THE LIMITATIONS OF RAJNI IN DANCING AND STILL CHOREOGRAPHED apt movements for him in his song sequences as a scientist and as a Robo.While the dance steps itself may not be very challenging, what is to be applauded is the body movements exibited by Rajni when he is singing and dancing as a human lover and as a robo lover. The transition of feelings to Robo and its after math, the kissing by Ishwarya Roy voluntarily first and by force later are shots which are beautifully scripted and consummated.HATS OFF.
> Ishwarya Roy-Awesome is the word which comes to my mind.There is none to equal her beauty and grace in the present day cinema, in my opinion. And her dances are full of elegance and some of the dresses that she wear are so attractive to her and to her alone ( for any other actress it might have appeared to be a mis fit or even bordering on vulgarity). From the days of Jeans (ANOTHER MOVIE BY shankar) she has come a long way. But years have added to her beauty .The expressive blue eyed girl, with her natural charm as "Ulaga Azhagi" justifies her role 100%. IN FACT IT IS ONE OF THE VERY FEW MOVIES WHEREIN HEROINE is present in every frame of the movie as hero himself and not with out valid reason.Her body movements, her mannerisms and eye movements especially when she meets with Robo FIRST AND TAKES HIM AS TOY FRIEND, first, later as BOY FRIEND and still later as a Wicked Monster are something to be chrished upon by every Rasigan of cinemas.
> The story line , simple and straight.What happens when A ROBO created by man kind tries to imitate the man kind itself? MAY BE FOR "C" class audience the movie might have appeared to be a show of technology , hard to digest unless they had access to Electronic yuga.That should not however take away the credit the stoty line demands, and the credit in full measure should go to my favourite author SUJTHA (out of admiration for whom my daghter has been christened by me as Sujatha).And even his nick name RANGUSKI,(in the movie the character or name pertains to a mosquito which bites Ishwarya roy leading to hilarious movements thereafter)shines thru the screen as his writings richly deserve.Three cheers to Sujatha, Shankar& Shankar in that order.
>the movie, if it is to be voted for first half and second half respectively, in my opinion the first half steals miles over the second half. And perhaps this impact of the first half gives enough momentum for the second half.Three scenes are note worthy.The first one when the Robo is tutored by Villain to attack Rajni himself, the second one when Robo saves people from a major fire disaster and the third one when the Robo supervises safely a complicated delivery to a woman.The dialogues show the class of SUJATHA.Eg:When the Robo goes to save the naked woman taking bath from fire, the woman protests saying that she is not wearing any dress. Quips the ROBO"I ALSO DO NOT WEAR ANY DRESS'.Similarly when Rajni admonishes RObo indicating that the woman is not having any dress quips the robo"she is having life".The fact that the media glare drives the woman to commit suicide is another event which distubs the hearts of the viewer.
>SONG SEQUENCES ARE APT AND BRILLIANT.AR RAHMAN has done his home work admirably well.Technological excellence is the best part of the movie.The fight sequences are grand and new to TAMIL CINEMA. Especially the second half steals the thunder when the Destructive Robo takes over complete charge.
Some of you might rise an eye brow as to whether there are no weak links at all.Yes there are few, like the wastage of two comedians, talent of a great villain of Hindi cinema NOT BEING PROPERLY TAPPED and slightly over extended fight scenes in the second half.BUT VIEWED IN THE TOTAL BACKDROP OF STORY, SONGS,PICTURISATION AND SPLENDID DIRECTORIAL TOUCHES BY SHANKAR BESIDES THE ACTING PROWESS OF RAJNI AND ISHWARYA, THE MOVIE CAN BE CONSIDERED AS WORTH WAITING FOR ITS RELEASE BY MORE THAN 2 YEARS.After quite a length of time , interms of production value and action sequences, Tamil Cinema is really giving a tough competition to Holly wood cinemas and that is what matters most..
...
Appa,
ReplyDelete(i) I did not find the film as enjoyable as you, amma and Asha - for a change unanimously - found it. Nonetheless, the strengths of the film that you have pointed out here are spot on and no qualms or quarrels about them.
(ii) Aishwarya Rai (please check your spelling, hehe! ;)) is not among my favourites, in fact, I like her senior - and Miss. Universe - Sushmita Sen better. But you're right Rai Bachchan was on a wholly different zone in this script.
(iii) If the word "dheerka dharisi" should be used for authors, it would fit Rangarajan alias Sujatha perfectly! :)
Sound review without trying to be cliched or too professional. Check out your upper case and lower case though. I could not understand if they were deliberate or accidental!
Hi hi,
ReplyDeleteYou know my weak link, spelling and "case" usage.Ofcourse some of the usages of "case" in the present blog is intentional..but do not ask which of them are intentional and which of them are accidental..hahaha
And while i agree with you on your comment regarding"Theerka Darisanam" of Rangarajn, i do not want to comapre the two ulaga azhagigal, as beuty, you will agree with me, is in the eyes of the beholder.
One scoop news.Today one of the writers(whise name i have seldom heard) has lodged a complaint against SUN MOVIES, caliming that the movie is based on his short story wriiten about a decade back.
With out going into the merits of his claim my question is , what is the probability of two writers thinking and conceiving the same type of story(or KARU as they call it)..